Portraits of Wildflowers

Perspectives on Nature Photography

Spiral spirit

with 47 comments

Recent pictures of one snail on a fresh basket-flower, another on an opening firewheel, and a foursome on a dry plant have pleased some of you, so here are three more photographs from the limaciferous* Blackland Prairie in Pflugerville during the week of May 4th.

These snails are equal-opportunity climbers. In the top picture, the plant is greenthread, Thelesperma filifolium. The climbed-upon in the middle photograph is blazing star, Liatris mucronata.  Finally you have a square-bud primrose, Oenothera capillifolia.

* I coined limaciferous from the roots of Latin limax ‘snail’ and ferre ‘to bear.’
The choice was between that and the English-Latin hybrid snailferous.

© 2020 Steven Schwartzman

Written by Steve Schwartzman

June 7, 2020 at 4:34 AM

47 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. ‘Snailferous’ sounds scary to a gardener, hehe! (But a good word, all the same. 🙂 )

    Ann Mackay

    June 7, 2020 at 5:15 AM

  2. I might have gone with ‘snailiferous’ as an analogue to ‘coniferous,’ but whichever word’s chosen, the photos are great. I’ve never seen a snail like the one in the middle image, other than in photographs. It strikes me that I usually see these shapes on the beach, in the form of seashells: another of those different-species-same-shape instances that I love.

    shoreacres

    June 7, 2020 at 5:20 AM

    • Normally the Latin-derived suffix -iferous gets added only to Latin roots:

      https://onelook.com/?w=*ferous&ssbp=1

      I was being linguistically playful with snailiferous. On the prairie in May I was mostly seeing snails like the ones in the first and last picture. At other times of the year it’s not unusual for me to find the kind in the second picture, typically on the ground and no longer living.

      As Old English fæger became fair, the predecessor of snail was snægl. If that were the modern form I could’ve talked about snagging a snægl.

      Steve Schwartzman

      June 7, 2020 at 7:18 AM

  3. Amazing compositions.
    It looks like you placed the snails there.

    rabirius

    June 7, 2020 at 6:04 AM

    • I understand how someone who hasn’t seen this phenomenon in person might believe I’d staged the pictures. Sometimes reality is stranger than we think.

      Steve Schwartzman

      June 7, 2020 at 7:06 AM

  4. beautiful exposition

    MichaelStephenWills

    June 7, 2020 at 6:34 AM

  5. Delightful captures. The top one looks almost impossible with the weight of the shell on that slender sprig.

    Lemony

    June 7, 2020 at 7:34 AM

  6. I am amazed at how these snails can climb these tender stalks. They must be relatively heavy with shells on their back. Have a great Sunday, Steve!

    Peter Klopp

    June 7, 2020 at 8:19 AM

    • I’ve occasionally seen the stalk that a snail is on droop from the extra weight. That may be happening a little in the third picture; the flower makes it hard to tell. I mentioned to the previous commenter that some plants with slender stalks are sturdier than they look.

      Steve Schwartzman

      June 7, 2020 at 8:24 AM

    • I think there’s bending in the first picture, too, but the snail is supported with the combined strength of several stalks.

      Steve Schwartzman

      June 7, 2020 at 8:30 AM

  7. Beautiful photos, Steve. I love snails, and slugs, in spite of how destructive they can be to my garden. Shells are works of art, inspiring spirals of Nature.

    Thanks for the Latin translation of “limax”. We have a slug up here, the leopard slug “Limax maximus”. It is not native. The Latin name always sounds regal to me, like a Roman emperor. 🙂
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limax_maximus

    Lavinia Ross

    June 7, 2020 at 10:28 AM

    • Limax maximus is new to me; I understand how the Latin name conjures up imperial visions, like the Circus Maximus in Rome. In shells nature conspires with geometry to produce on form of art in nature.

      Steve Schwartzman

      June 7, 2020 at 1:13 PM

  8. Utterly remarkable. The snail truly seems suspended in the first shot. I understand your explanation, but on first glance it just looks impossible.

    Michael Scandling

    June 7, 2020 at 10:56 AM

  9. I’ve never seen snails this size, I love the spiral designs of their shells, even if the slime trail they leave always leaves me feeling a bit ill.

    Robert Parker

    June 7, 2020 at 11:13 AM

    • As you’ve been seeing for a month, these small snails are quite common here. Some are larger, but still not close to the bigger ones we’re used to from the seashore. I expect the buoyancy that water provides allows for snails to grow larger, especially in salt water. The English word slime is actually a relative of the Latin līmus that meant the same thing, and from which the Latin for snail was derived.

      Steve Schwartzman

      June 7, 2020 at 1:23 PM

  10. Gorgeous!

    K.J. Ottinger

    June 7, 2020 at 6:09 PM

  11. Beautiful images!

    Angela Moyer

    June 7, 2020 at 10:20 PM

  12. It’s surprising to me that a snail is able able to wrap its little climbing apparatus around such slender stalks to achieve such heights. I find myself wondering what the attraction is. Are they after the pollen, or do they simply long for an enhanced perspective of their environs?

    krikitarts

    June 8, 2020 at 2:48 AM

  13. Great finds and captures. Don’t know that I have ever noticed snails clinging onto plants when I am out and about. Are there certain places where this happens?

    denisebushphoto

    June 8, 2020 at 1:33 PM

    • The greatest numbers that I’ve seen have been on the prairie in northeast Austin but I’ve also found lesser numbers in other parts of town. I don’t understand the phenomenon; I wish I knew more about it.

      Steve Schwartzman

      June 8, 2020 at 1:47 PM

  14. Nice finds!!

    norasphotos4u

    June 8, 2020 at 8:55 PM

  15. Beauties!

    artsofmay

    June 9, 2020 at 6:45 PM

  16. Snails have never looked so good .. I agree, super compositions Steve 🙂

    Julie@frogpondfarm

    June 13, 2020 at 3:18 PM

  17. Ah, I’m one of the snail picture-lovers, especially when they seem to be in odd places. The first two really look suspended – very cool, Steve! 🙂 Like Denise, I didn’t know snails would cling to plants this way, but a few years ago I saw the phenomenon in a field near Seattle. It was late September and there were a few of them on stalks of tall, completely dried-out plants – a common wildflower, can’t think of what it was.

    bluebrightly

    June 13, 2020 at 9:03 PM

    • Ah, so you’ve seen the phenomenon, too, and are an enjoyer of it. Welcome to the club. I photographed another snail on a plant this week but haven’t again seen the large numbers that I did at this prairie site five weeks ago.

      Steve Schwartzman

      June 13, 2020 at 10:12 PM

  18. Stunned by your photos and by the snail agility course. Wonderful.

    navasolanature

    July 20, 2020 at 5:06 PM

    • Thanks. I like the way you put it: “snail agility course.” There sure were a lot of them out there.

      Steve Schwartzman

      July 20, 2020 at 5:23 PM

  19. […] well past May’s peak of limaciferousness in central Texas, the land beneath our baking sun has continued to host many a snail. Whether the […]

  20. These, and the images of the more recent post, are really engaging. I know we have snails around here but I very seldom see them and they are much smaller. Of course.

    melissabluefineart

    October 5, 2020 at 9:23 AM

    • Some of these pictures are very close, so the size may not be obvious. In fact most of the snails here are tiny, often as little as a quarter of an inch long. Just yesterday I was happy to photograph a tiny one on a species of native plant that I’ve hardly ever seen.

      Steve Schwartzman

      October 5, 2020 at 9:38 AM

      • OH, that explains it although I thought they looked large compared to the flower they were on.

        melissabluefineart

        October 6, 2020 at 8:50 AM

        • I may have misled you a little when I wrote “most of the snails here,” by which I meant in the Austin area, not this particular post. The snails shown in the first and last picture were bigger than the quarter of an inch I mentioned, more like a half to three-quarters of an inch.

          Steve Schwartzman

          October 6, 2020 at 10:30 AM

          • Ok yes that makes sense. I occasionally see tiny snails here but not generally up on vegetation like this. Very interesting.

            melissabluefineart

            October 6, 2020 at 9:34 PM


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

<span>%d</span> bloggers like this: