Portraits of Wildflowers

Perspectives on Nature Photography

Palo Duro earth

with 22 comments

  

It wasn’t only grand landscapes that I focused on at Palo Duro Canyon
on May 14th. The orange-brown earth at our feet also had its appeal.

 

 

The second view lends itself to pareidolia. A shrieking rabbit, anyone? In the third picture
you see subtle traces of the way rainwater had flowed a couple of days before our visit.

  

 

In the last view the remnants of the recent flow are more conspicuous.

 

 

 

§

§       §       §

§

 

 

Gobbledygook

 

In commentaries over the past three years I’ve called out the delusions that have swept through the formerly scientific field of medicine. One manifestation of that delusionality is the making up of “genders.” People have catalogued well over a hundred of them, and the number is still growing. Another manifestation of delusionality is that increasingly many people with medical degrees blithely accept such nonsense.

Last week I came across a website called MedicineNet, whose About page tells us: “Founded in 1996, MedicineNet.com is a nationally-recognized, doctor-produced network consisting of more than 70 U.S. board-certified physicians. MedicineNet.com is a trusted source for online health and medical information.”

What brought me to that website was the article “What Are the 72 Other Genders?” The article credits Shaziya Allarakha, MD, as the medical author, and  Pallavi Suyog Uttekar, MD, as the medical reviewer. In answer to the question “What is gender identity,” the article proclaims:

 

In today’s age, one does not need to fit in with regards [sic] to their choices, including their gender identity.

  • Gender is no more regarded as a binary concept where one can either be a male or a female.
  • It has emerged as a continuum or spectrum where one can identify themselves as any of the gender identities.

The term gender identity means how a person identifies themselves [sic] concerning their gender. It may be regardless of their anatomy or genetics. Thus, a person may identify themselves as male, female, none, both, or some other category independent of their genitals.

The idea is to make everyone feel comfortable in their skin irrespective of what gender they were assigned at birth.

 

Then the article asserts that “Besides male and female, there are 72 other genders,” which it goes on to list. Here are the first 10:

 

  1. Agender: A person who does not identify themselves [sic] with or experience any gender. Agender people are also called null-gender, genderless, gendervoid, or neutral gender.
  2. Abimegender: Associated with being profound, deep, and infinite. The term abimegender may be used alone or in combination with other genders. [Abîme in French means ‘abyss.’]
  3. Adamas gender: A gender that is indefinable or indomitable. People identifying with this gender refuse to be categorized in any particular gender identity.
  4. Aerogender: Also called evaisgender, this gender identity changes according to one’s surroundings.
  5. Aesthetigender: Also called aesthetgender, it is a type of gender identity derived from aesthetics.
  6. Affectugender: This is based on the person’s mood swings or fluctuations.
  7. Agenderflux: A person with this gender identity is mostly agender with brief shifts of belonging to other gender types.
  8. Alexigender: The person has a fluid gender identity between more than one type of gender although they cannot name the genders they feel fluid in.
  9. Aliusgender: This gender identity stands apart from existing social gender constructs. It means having a strong specific gender identity that is neither male nor female.
  10. Amaregender: Having a gender identity that changes depending on the person one is emotionally attached to. [Amare is the Latin and Italian verb meaning ‘to love.’]

 

What a bunch of gobbledygook—and what a travesty that people with medical degrees are passing these delusions off as if they’re real.

 

 

© 2024 Steven Schwartzman

 

 

 

 

 

 

Written by Steve Schwartzman

June 13, 2024 at 4:06 AM

22 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. The first photo brought to mind aerial views of a river drainage. I’m with you on the rabbit, but a very special rabbit: the west Texas jackalope. As for the last, how about three loaves of bread with floury crusts on a cooling rack?

    As for that list, check the ‘Gs’ for geniusgender. I suspect it’s going extinct.

    shoreacres

    June 13, 2024 at 6:46 AM

    • It does seem that the ways in which water flows are similar, or maybe even the same, on a large scale and a small one. I expect physicists and hydrologists could say more about that.

      Ah yes, the famous jackalope, which one article regrets isn’t indigenous to Texas. Regarding the last picture, I’m with you in seeing loaves of bread with floury crusts.

      Well said about geniusgender going extinct. On this topic I’d settle for normal rationality.

      Steve Schwartzman

      June 13, 2024 at 7:07 AM

  2. Thank you, Steve, for the beautiful images of Earth!

    As to your discovery, Steve, are you sure the “medical information” which is really verbal diarrhea, is not created at the Lunatic Asylum?

    Joanna

    gabychops

    June 13, 2024 at 9:24 AM

  3. Beautiful earth colors. I see an angry fish in the top image and am thinking Jack-a-lope in the second one, or maybe another Dr. Seuss character. 😊 Oh, I see Linda has also seen the Jack-a-lope! I love it.

    circadianreflections

    June 13, 2024 at 9:27 AM

  4. You have a unique artistic vision which envisions nature’s unique artistic visions. Thank you for continuing to share your images.

    Count me as another who sees fresh loaves of crusty bread in the fourth image.

    Wally Jones

    June 13, 2024 at 12:50 PM

    • You’re welcome. Better to share these visions than have them molder away in a digital box. You got me to thinking that when we speak to someone distinctive (rather than about someone distinctive) we could use the unique word younique.

      The crusty “bread” at Palo Duro may look appetizing but I wouldn’t care for a mouthful.

      Steve Schwartzman

      June 13, 2024 at 3:54 PM

  5. After reading that article, I find myself identifying with your shrieking rabbit. 😳🐇

  6. I like these photos and the rich color of the landscape, Steve. The colors are so alive. In addition to the beautiful colors and the very nice textures, I can’t help but wonder if these same photos would still look beautiful as B&W shots. It may require a little push in contrast but I think it would be a natural progression in the workflow.

    oneowner

    June 13, 2024 at 1:45 PM

    • From 1969 through the mid-1980s I did almost all my “serious” photography in black and white. Then I took a break and pursued other things. When I got back into photography around the year 2000 I became enamored of color and have stuck almost entirely with it in the digital age. Once in a while I’ve found a reason to convert to black and white, and even more rarely I’ve fooled around with partly desaturating an image. I’ll play around with today’s Palo Duro pictures to see what they look like in black and white.

      Steve Schwartzman

      June 13, 2024 at 4:07 PM

      • My first years in photography were almost exclusively black and white and, even to this day, I continue to have an interest in it. In my mind, some images just work better in B&W.

        oneowner

        June 13, 2024 at 8:01 PM

  7. One of the things I enjoy about these photos is that there’s little, if anything, to give context to the size of what I’m looking at. Is it something you saw from a plane high above the ground, or a small patch of ground seen from up close? I love photos that leave me wondering.

    Todd Henson

    June 15, 2024 at 6:40 PM

    • I’ve often had occasion to think about the scale of what’s in a photograph. Sometimes the teacher in me comes out and gives measurements. At other times the artist says it’s not important; let the abstraction be.

      Steve Schwartzman

      June 15, 2024 at 6:51 PM

  8. What an incredible place. And yes, definitely a rabbit!

    navasolanature

    June 20, 2024 at 5:27 AM

    • Ah, so you’ve joined the rabbit brigade. Palo Duro has a lot to offer, both on a grand scale with geological formations and on the literally down-to-earth scale shown in this post.

      Steve Schwartzman

      June 20, 2024 at 7:23 AM


Leave a comment