Posts Tagged ‘backlighting’
Two takes on silver bluestem
From June 24th in St. Edward’s Park come these two takes on the grass called silver bluestem, Bothriochloa laguroides. The second view of one of these seed heads looks quite different from the first due to backlighting. Whereas the black backgrounds in many of my recent pictures resulted from the close use of a ring flash, in this case flash would have destroyed the effect of the backlighting. Instead, I had to look for a dark patch in the landscape that I could line up my subject with. In a shaded copse of trees not far away I found a dark area just large enough to surround the backlit seed head.
§
§ § §
§
From 2017 through 2019 the folks at Gapminder posed various questions to people. Here are four you can try your hand (or brain) at. I’ll give the answers in a couple of days.
1) In 1980, roughly 40% of the world’s population lived in extreme poverty, with less than $2 per day.
What is the share today? A) 10% B) 30% C) 50%
2) During the past 40 years the amount of oil and natural gas remaining in known reserves has:
A) been reduced to less than half B) remained more or less the same C) more than doubled
3) How much of the world’s total land surface has some physical infrastructure built on it, like houses or roads (excluding farm land)? A) less than 5% B) around 15% C) more than 25%
4) How many of the world’s one-year-old children were vaccinated against some disease in 2019?
A) less than 20% B) around 50% C) more than 80%
© 2022 Steven Schwartzman
Backlit sycamore leaf

The foliage of a bald cypress tree wasn’t the only backlit thing I portrayed at Inks Lake State Park on November 29th. The leaves of sycamore tree saplings (Platanus occidentalis) tend to grow in an upright posture, and that made it easy for me to line up one such leaf against the sparkles coming off Inks Lake. Lens optics turned that bright scene into a phantasmagoria. Note the spider silk across each of the two arcs formed by the leaf’s upper lobes.
𝚹
𝚹 𝚹
𝚹
Two posts back I mentioned that I’m reading Steven Pinker’s new book Rationality: What It Is, Why It Seems Scarce, Why It Matters. Based on some statistics he mentions that were taken from Bobby Duffy’s Why We’re Wrong About Nearly Everything, I invited you to estimate what percent of the American population you think certain groups represent. (The percents in other countries often differ, of course.)
Survey respondents on average have estimated 28% of Americans are immigrants, whereas the actual figure is 12%.
Survey respondents on average have estimated 24% of Americans are gay, while the true figure is 4.5%.
Survey respondents on average have estimated about a third of Americans are African Americans, when the actual figure is 12.7%.
Survey respondents on average have estimated 18% of Americans are Jews, who in fact make up only 2% of the population.
Survey respondents on average have estimated that in the world as a whole, 20% of girls and women aged 15–19 give birth each year, while the actual figure is just 2%.
One cause of the discrepancies in perception is media coverage, which focuses on certain things out of proportion to their actual occurrence. For example, you never see an urgent news story about the tens of thousands of airplanes that took off, flew, and landed safely today; you only hear about the minuscule fraction of planes that crashed.
People’s tendency to estimate the proportion of something based on the degree to which they’ve been exposed to that thing is known as the availability heuristic.
© 2021 Steven Schwartzman
Red oak leaf and soft clouds
While down close to the ground on November 22 photographing the Great Plains ladies tresses’ orchids you saw last time, I noticed some oak leaves near by that looked bright red from backlighting by the sun. As shown here, I managed to isolate one of those leaves against soft clouds. The species could well have been Texas red oak, Quercus buckleyi.
❦
❦ ❦
❦
“We write to express our alarm over recent trends in K-12 mathematics education in the United States.”
So begins an open letter signed by hundreds of experts in mathematics, computer science, engineering, and related fields. The letter goes on to explain that the movement for “equity” in mathematics education, whatever its professed goals, actually harms American students and reduces our nation’s mathematical preparedness. The letter isn’t long, and I encourage you to read it.
© 2021 Steven Schwartzman
Sunlight from behind versus flash from in front
Behold two takes on flameleaf sumac, Rhus lanceolata, from November 1st along Spicewood Springs Rd. In the top view I took advantage of the sun in front of me for backlighting; in the other picture I used flash. You might say the second view isn’t “natural,” but then neither is photography.
Only when processing the pictures a couple of weeks after I took them did I notice some sort of translucent insect. You can make it out near the center of the lower photograph. Higher up you can also make out a tiny lacewing egg attached by a filament to one of the leaflets. Now that you’re aware of those two things, you can also see them in the top picture.
❀
❀ ❀ ❀
❀
The other day I learned about an important court case from 2008 involving free speech. It’s described in an Inside Higher Ed article and you can watch a half-hour video about it produced by the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education.
© 2021 Steven Schwartzman
Backlit icicles
February 20th marked the fourth and last of my recent forays into Great Hills Park for ice and snow pictures. For the first time in my life (if memory serves) I photographed backlit icicles. In the opening view I used flash so I could stop down to f/18. That way everything was in focus, from the nearest rocks in the lower right to the ruins of the fallen Ashe juniper tree, Juniperus ashei, in the upper left, where the backlighting is also the most evident in the top picture. Contrast that with the second image, where I got closer and avoided flash so that backlighting would be the main source of illumination.
© 2021 Steven Schwartzman