The water without the lilies
The previous post showed you water lilies at the Brazoria National Wildlife Refuge on October 6th. One adjacent span of water interested me in its own right because of its rippled surface. Funny, I don’t even remember a breeze, yet without one I couldn’t have recorded this textured abstraction.
© 2019 Steven Schwartzman
that is such an interesting texture, especially without the benefit of wind
beth
November 7, 2019 at 5:04 AM
I assume there was some wind but I didn’t notice it.
Steve Schwartzman
November 7, 2019 at 6:10 AM
…and the breezes were from different point of the compass, the reason for the complex pattern.
MichaelStephenWills
November 7, 2019 at 5:08 AM
That would explain the pattern; thanks.
Steve Schwartzman
November 7, 2019 at 6:11 AM
Clearly, some wind was involved, but it wouldn’t have needed to be much to create these miniature standing waves. I see them often in my marina, occasionally on the bay, and I’ve seen them twice offshore, which was more than enough for me.
Given the enclosed nature of the pond, this is what I suspect happened. Wind coming from one direction set up a wave train. The waves met some obstacle that sent them back against the wind-created waves, et voilà! Standing waves — or, in this case, wavelets. The science is as interesting as the image is engaging.
shoreacres
November 7, 2019 at 7:12 AM
Your linked article has a good, clear animation. When I read the sentence “To create a standing wave, all you need to do is send a wave train across a confined container against its wall,” I couldn’t help animating the wave itself, and I wondered if sending the wave train across a confined container was done against its will.
The top half of the photograph in this post showed water lilies and the bases of bulrushes beyond them. I cropped to eliminate those things and leave nothing but wave, a photographic equivalent of nothing but net.
Steve Schwartzman
November 7, 2019 at 7:31 AM
You are so right: no wind no ripples. Great abstract photo, Steve!
Peter Klopp
November 7, 2019 at 8:03 AM
This degree of abstraction isn’t to everyone’s taste, but I was taken with the image and I’m glad you are, too.
Steve Schwartzman
November 7, 2019 at 8:07 AM
The degree of abstraction is entirely and exactly to my taste. Bravo.
Michael Scandling
November 7, 2019 at 11:33 AM
To the same degree that your abstractions are generally smooth, this one is unsmooth.
Steve Schwartzman
November 7, 2019 at 11:59 AM
Isn’t it great that we’re not all the same?
Michael Scandling
November 7, 2019 at 12:00 PM
Amen.
Steve Schwartzman
November 7, 2019 at 12:01 PM
There have been times when I arrived at a pond thinking it was smooth as glass only to recognize the slightest of breezes creating ripples. Your image looks like there may have been breezes from more than one direction. It’s a very interesting pattern.
Steve Gingold
November 7, 2019 at 7:03 PM
Linda proposed a related explanation a few comments earlier. Whatever the cause, I was the photographic beneficiary.
Steve Schwartzman
November 7, 2019 at 8:30 PM
This picture would make a lovely fabric design, especially a wool fabric.
Marie E. Laing
November 7, 2019 at 9:16 PM
Hi, Marie. If you have the know-how to do it, I’d love to see it.
Steve Schwartzman
November 8, 2019 at 6:11 AM
I like the texture with a wonderful degree of abstraction.
Dina
November 8, 2019 at 5:05 AM
Me too! The upper half of this image included some water lilies and beyond them the bases of some bulrushes. I decided to crop the top half of the picture off to leave an abstract view of the water in its own right.
Steve Schwartzman
November 8, 2019 at 6:15 AM