Portraits of Wildflowers

Perspectives on Nature Photography

Cardinal flower: a cluttered view and one that’s less so

with 33 comments

On the pleasant afternoon of November 1st we traipsed along the boardwalk around one side of the pond at River Place. I was surprised when I looked down over the railing and saw bright red atop a lone cardinal flower plant (Lobelia cardinalis). In photographing plants I rarely aim straight down because that’s the most likely way to end up with lots of clutter in a picture, as you see here in the photo I took with my 24–105mm lens zoomed to its maximum focal length:

Normally I reduce background clutter in a wildflower portrait by getting close and aiming horizontally, or by getting low and aiming upward. In this case the plant was growing in shallow water, in addition to which the railing and the raised boardwalk prevented me from getting close to the cardinal flower. What to do? I switched to my 100–400mm lens, zoomed it to its maximum, leaned as far as I could over the railing, and then even stretched my arms out so my eye was no longer at the camera’s viewfinder. Guessing at framing my subject and relying on the camera’s autofocus, I ended up with this portrait:

The cardinal flower ranges across an enormous territory from Mexico to Canada, including California through Maine in the United States, as you can verify on a map. You’ve got to hand it to a plant that tolerates the winters in Quebec as well as the summers in Nevada. That last location strikes me as especially surprising, given that this species has to grow near water.

© 2018 Steven Schwartzman

Advertisements

Written by Steve Schwartzman

November 21, 2018 at 4:55 PM

33 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. I’m OK with clutter, in general, but definitely like the closeup shot, that’s great and worth the extra effort. It’s a terrific, intense red. Haven’t seen it in the wild, I would have remembered.

    Robert Parker

    November 21, 2018 at 5:11 PM

    • Yes, it’s hard to forget the vibrant red of a cardinal flower once you’ve seen one. Thoreau mentioned cardinal flowers in New England. I never knowingly saw one until years after I’d moved to Austin. Let’s hope you come across a cardinal flower before too long.

      Steve Schwartzman

      November 21, 2018 at 5:53 PM

  2. What a gorgeous color!

    montucky

    November 21, 2018 at 10:07 PM

  3. The second picture is just perfect!
    Happy Thanksgiving to you, my friend,
    Pit

    Pit

    November 22, 2018 at 8:56 AM

    • And a happy Thanksgiving to you guys, too. Looks like you’ll have to generate some inner sunshine today in the Hill Country.

      Yes, the second photo is a big improvement. I wouldn’t normally show the first one, except it serves here as part of a lesson.

      Steve Schwartzman

      November 22, 2018 at 9:05 AM

      • Yes, it looks like an overcast day here in our neck of the woods.
        I like comparing fotos, like I sometimes do in my “before and after” series on my “Bilderbuch Blog”.

        Pit

        November 22, 2018 at 9:08 AM

  4. Both are beautiful photos. I like when I can see the subject in its environment, but of course, the close-up is less cluttered and focuses the eyes on the intense red petals.

    Otto von Münchow

    November 22, 2018 at 2:32 PM

    • Yes, the teacher in me is willing to accept the first picture as environmental and informational. The artist in me wouldn’t be happy without the portrait that follows.

      Happy Thanksgiving from Texas.

      Steve Schwartzman

      November 22, 2018 at 2:43 PM

  5. The second image is lovely. A long lens is a great resource for simplifying a background. I’ve found cardinal flower in a number of places in New England, and in the Midwest as well, usually in wet places. Hope you had a fine Thanksgiving…

    tomwhelan

    November 22, 2018 at 10:03 PM

    • Thanks, Tom. Retroactive good wishes for Thanksgiving to you, too. You may be the only commenter on this post who has seen cardinal flowers in person. Lucky us. Also not surprising is the fact that you know how good a resource a long lens can be for reducing background distractions.

      Steve Schwartzman

      November 23, 2018 at 8:07 AM

      • I never thought Cardinal flower was an unusual find, not that I see it that often. A stunning flower, and hard to photograph well. A while back, I wrote an article for a photography website about angle of view, focal length, and the effect on backgrounds. A focal length of 300mm (or so) with some extension is great for flower and insect photography. It’s amazing how many people believe a 100mm macro lens is all they need for closeups.

        tomwhelan

        November 23, 2018 at 9:08 AM

        • While cardinal flowers aren’t really rare here, I don’t often see them, which matches your experience. And like you, I’ve had trouble photographing the flowers well, in part because the red is so rich and in part because key components of the inflorescence sit at different distances from the lens. I haven’t had a lot of luck with long lenses for closeups, so maybe I should practice some more.

          Steve Schwartzman

          November 23, 2018 at 9:24 AM

          • The reds do tend to oversaturate and depth of field is an issue with this flower. Such a beauty, though!

            tomwhelan

            November 23, 2018 at 4:28 PM

  6. I had the same difficulty at the Pineywoods Native Plant Center in Nacogdoches when I tried to photograph the endangered Neches River rose mallow. I found four flowers in a marshy area beneath and along a boardwalk, and they were surrounded by so many other plants it was hard to isolate one. Not only were the flowers poorly placed (for my purposes, if not theirs), they’re so deep that it was hard to keep everything in focus. You did a wonderful job with the cardinal flower, and I’m glad you included both images.

    I just was looking at the plant list for the PNPC, and see that cardinal flower is listed. Perhaps next year I’ll get to see it there.

    I was interested in the discussion of a long lens for closeups. Last weekend I went down to the refuge despite the steady rain. I hoped it would quit, but it didn’t, so I pulled out my 70-300mm lens and shot flowers from the car. It was a little surprising to me to see how well it worked: not always, but sometimes. I wouldn’t have imagined such a thing possible.

    shoreacres

    November 23, 2018 at 7:46 PM

    • What a coincidence that we both had the same sort of boardwalk problem. I didn’t know if I could get a decent picture of the cardinal flower. The dimming light had me shooting at the lens’s broadest aperture of f/5.6, something that made for a shallow depth of field and therefore lowered the chances of keeping important parts of the flowers in focus. As you’ve seen in the comments, I included the first image for teacherly and documentary purposes only, given its lack of esthetics. Good luck with a cardinal flower of your own and also the Neches River rose mallow.

      Some years ago I ran into two butterfly photographers who took all their pictures with long lenses. I haven’t had much luck photographing butterflies that way. I still prefer getting close with my macro lens, but it might be worth experimenting some more with the telephoto approach.

      Steve Schwartzman

      November 23, 2018 at 10:34 PM

  7. Absolute stunner Steve 😄

    Julie@frogpondfarm

    November 24, 2018 at 12:00 AM

  8. We grew something related to this as cut lower back in 1986. It had the same species name. I do not remember the variety name. I think it had bronzed foliage. It is an odd cut flower crop. Designers wanted it back in the 1980s.

    tonytomeo

    November 24, 2018 at 2:25 PM

    • While I’m not a designer, I still want cardinal flowers and am always delighted to come across one.

      Steve Schwartzman

      November 24, 2018 at 5:04 PM

  9. Your “guesswork” proved very accurate, Steve!

    tanjabrittonwriter

    November 24, 2018 at 5:00 PM


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: